Where’s Winter

The North Shore mountains are home to three ski hills…none of which are operating and February still has a week to go. Although they managed to open for a few short weeks, rain and warm weather has left nothing on the runs but dust and dried up grass, like Mount Seymour pictured here at the base of the lift (1000 metres elevation).

Base of Ski Hill

Base of Ski Hill

The majority of the trail is sub alpine, so there are nearly always views of Vancouver to the south and mountains every other direction. The yellow in the middle of the Vancouver photo are huge piles of sulfur awaiting shipment from Neptune Terminals.

Vancouver

Vancouver

The hike up to the summit is 455 metres higher and out of the ski area to the west. It’s a nice early season training jaunt – usually late April – that whets the appetite for summer scrambles. To be on the safe side I packed along instep crampons and an ice axe along with a snack. Needn’t have bothered. On a round trip of 7.5 K, there might have been 300 metres of snow to contend with and the odd slippery section. Basically, the hike was little different from mid summer when there isn’t a speck of white stuff hanging about. Only a short stretch of 40 metres could be considered a problem as the trail narrows down to half metre ledge but with some snow still there, it is now only two boot widths wide.

Ledge Trail

Ledge Trail

Not once on my journey today did I wonder whether climate change or global warming has managed to play havoc with this winters conditions. It often happens there are very poor snow years, although this one may be close to a record. Since Vancouver and parts of the Lower Mainland depend on the snow pack for water, it may raise a critical shortage during late summer. However, for the moment I’m happy with the early appearance of hiking season. ¬†ūüôā

Gully

Gully

Northeast

Northeast

Garibaldi

Garibaldi

Going Places

Neon sign

Going Places Neon

Judging by the actions of security forces hunkered in at Semiahmoo Mall, the only places photographers might be going would be the local penitentiary. Had already snapped one shot, which may not have been apparent to the fast approaching rent-a-cop, and was touched lightly on the arm inquiring as to what exactly I was doing. “Why I thought I’d just taken a photo of this sign for my neon blog” was not apparently the correct answer. Was brusquely informed the mall was private property and cameras were not allowed. When I inquired about exterior pictures I was informed that also was verboten, even from off property. Packed up my camera and departed.

Sent the mall owners РFirst Capital Realty Р a customer comment which will probably be ignored. Really, they should drag themselves into the 21st century. For one reason or another there are likely hundreds of photos snapped daily in the mall with cellphones as reminders or for price comparisons. Will the mall begin bag searches?


The above post was for another blog I use to try out new ideas from time to time. Right now my wife and I are working on our own photo a day challenge for both enjoyment and to look a little closer at everything. So for the month of February, I’m trying to get a shot of a neon sign – the ubiquitous ‘open’ ones not allowed – everyday, which is a bit tougher when we no longer reside in Vancouver. So that explains heading to the local mall where three stores still have neon signs.

By chance the same evening I read an online story from the Toronto Star about the city restricting photography in local parks and venues. Even though they quickly went into damage control to pull back on a complete ban, a city official still insisted some picture taking would not be allowed despite not being against Canadian law. Authorities are constantly seizing cameras and cellphones – often illegally and accidentally erasing content – and are later ordered by the courts to return the items as the owners were doing nothing against the law by filming or photographing events happening in public. Most of our public art galleries still ban photography based on outdated practices. There are credible studies which show paintings can be damaged over time from exposure to light flashes, especially years ago when flashbulbs were the norm; however, nowadays most cameras and cellphones are capable of lower light shots without any need of extra light. I have photos taken in The Louvre, Mus√©e d’Orsay¬†and the Tate with security personnel all around and was never questioned or prevented from snapping away. The usual defense by Canadian museum directors relates to copyright issues, but it’s almost impossible not to find photographs or prints available of every painting or art object in existence. There are likely more copies, photos and renderings of the ‘Mona Lisa’ than there are people on earth.

Like most people these days I use my camera or my Nexus 7 tablet – I may be the last person to not own a cellphone – to grab images of sale items, locations or any number of things as reminders for later use. Much handier than trying to find a pencil and paper. And many of these have been taken in other malls with security people around without any concern on their part.¬†But all bureaucratic¬†levels including municipal¬†have come to regard¬† this as snooping and possible interference with national governance.¬†No matter where you go these days there seems to be a government authorized camera dogging your every step and recording your actions. This is considered appropriate because ‘model citizens’ have nothing to hide.

There’s an excellent opinion piece in the Toronto Star by William Kowalski on the current push to limit public photography. As he states, ‘there is no law against public photography in Canada’ which I’ve always been aware of since I started snapping pics and developing film some years ago. And I plan to keep on in spite of the small minded bureaucrats and self-interested politicians lined up to take away my rights.

Camera photo

Keep It Free

As to the mall owners, once I referred to their obnoxious and heavy handed ¬†security people on Facebook, they got back to me in less than fifteen minutes to assure me they would look into the situation. Maybe I’ll hear back or then again maybe not.

Thought these new laws brought in by the US Forest Service for my neighbours to the south were controversial but I’ve not had the chance to follow up.